Discussion about this post

User's avatar
John Ketchum's avatar

One thing missing from the collapse narrative is the historical performance of diversified private investment. As far as I know, there has never been a 20-year period in American history in which a broad, diversified equity portfolio produced negative real returns. My own retirement account is diversified across U.S. equities, developed-market equities, emerging-market equities, U.S. and foreign REITs, U.S. and foreign fixed-income securities, and gold. A portfolio like that compounds across many different economic regimes, not just during post-war American dominance.

By contrast, Social Security is a pay-as‑you-go transfer system tied directly to demographics. It doesn’t invest, it doesn’t compound, and it doesn’t generate inheritable wealth. If the money now taken in payroll taxes were invested in diversified assets instead, most workers would retire with higher real returns and be able to leave something to their children. At the macro level, that shift would also increase capital formation, raise productivity, and reduce government debt.

The real issue isn’t that markets can’t deliver long-run returns. It’s that Social Security is structurally incapable of doing so.

2 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?